Science Fiction

Piranesi

Susanna Clarke

Science Fiction
231 pagesEbookFirst published 2020Bloomsburyfirst

Reader Match

Build your match

Use Discover to compare this book against a reading profile. Riley Locke will not invent a percentage without comparable evidence.

Open Discover
Good fit if

Expect a Science Fiction reading experience shaped by Big Dumb Object, Epistolary SF, and Unreliable Instrument, with first POV. It is best approached for its reading feel and fit rather than for advance knowledge of later-book outcomes.

Consider before reading

No specific content guidance has been added yet.

Commitment

231 pages

About this book

What it feels like to read.

The House is the world, and its resident keeps meticulous journals of tides, statues, and the fifteen dead, and Clarke's 2020 novel, seventeen years after her last, arrived at novella pace and prize-list weight simultaneously. The desk files it SF-side, on the record, under the told-and-not-told protocol the registry learnt from Ishiguro. This is a parallel cosmology investigated by experiment, a scientist's book about a world with different physics, and the reveal is epistemic, which means the essay must reproduce the withholding or break the instrument under review.

The premise, audited: what if a scientist lived alone in an infinite house of statues and tides, and his own journals held more than he remembered writing? Piranesi, so the Other calls him, though he is sure it is not his name, lives in halls that run beyond mapping, tends the dead, reads the tides, catalogues thousands of statues, and meets the Other twice weekly to assist research into a Great and Secret Knowledge. He is happy. His method is exact. His journals are indexed. And the reader, running the same evidence with an outside mind, begins assembling a different conclusion chapters before Piranesi permits himself the data, which is the book's engine, dread and tenderness rising together on the same instrument readings.

What the desk admires is the narrator as uncontaminated instrument. Piranesi observes with a scientist's discipline and a saint's lack of suspicion, and the House rewards the first while the plot punishes the second, and Clarke keeps both readings alive in every entry. The beauty is not decoration on the mystery. The beauty is evidence in it, and what the statues, the tides, and the birds finally testify to is sealed, along with the Other's identity, the person the journals call 16, everything the earlier volumes contain, and the choice the ending offers.

The load-bearing science is epistemology itself, how knowledge is kept, indexed, lost, and recovered, and the delay on the mirror is gentle but present, a book about what institutions and persons do to inconvenient knowers.

Verdict on the premise's bill. Paid, entry by entry, in the journals' own hand.

Honest notices: psychological captivity rendered obliquely, drowned dead treated with reverence, gaslighting as slow-dawning fact, and a beauty that some readers will find static for fifty pages. The desk found the stillness load-bearing.

Who is this for? Readers who want mystery conducted by index card, scientists of any weather, the recently overwhelmed. The House is quiet. The book teaches its own pace, and the desk kept the journal format for a week after.

Book details

The record behind this book.

Edition, publication, classification, and verified story metadata associated with this record.

See editions →

Book knowledge

Spoiler-safe context before you commit.

Edit this page →

Characters

This section is ready for a reader to improve.

Setting & world

the house and its endless halls secondary-world

Tropes & patterns

Big Dumb Object Epistolary SF Unreliable Instrument

Relationships

assistant and researcher keeper and kept

Community & circles

Read with people you trust.

Compare reactions, discuss the book, and use private circle activity as social context.

Discussion

Talk about the book.

Discussion

Talk with readers who are here for the same book world.

All discussions →
Be the first reader to start a discussion here.

Reading circles

What do people you trust think?

Sign in to compare this book with your private circles and see trusted-friend reading signals.

Sign in for circle context
Sign in Sign up